![]() |
|
Ozone: 2001 time series of surface measurements from Algoma, Canada (black line) and GEM-AQ (red line). Summer episodes are captured well by the model. There is a slight low bias in winter, indicating the dry deposition rate over snow may be too high. Carbon monoxide: comparison of GEM-AQ (left) MOPITT CO (right) at 500 hPa level for April 2002 (top) and October 2002 (bottom). GEM-AQ captures the overall pattern, but misses the biomass burning signatures in Amazonia in April and in Indonesia in October. This is a result of using climatological biomass burning emissions, not year-specific emissions based on fire counts. GEM-AQ on a regional scale The "multiscale" aspect of GEM-AQ is demonstrated by simulations done on a global variable resolution grid (an example of this type of grid is shown the figure below). This type of grid was used to study the transport of forest fire smoke in July of 2002 (O'Neill et al., Amos. Env., 2006). A portion of the global variable resolution grid with ~24km resolution core over eastern US and Canada. The global variable resolution grid allows for high resolution regional simulations without the concerns of domain boundary conditions as in a limited area grid and reduced computational time compared with a global uniform resolution. Comparison of MODIS satellite visible image with modelled aerosol optical depth. Click here for an animation of the simulated smoke plume at 850 hPa, for July 6-15, 2002. GEM-AQ in Europe GEM-AQ
was also used to study the European heat wave in July of 2006. Modelled
ozone and nitrogen dioxide as well as meteorological parameters
were compared with surface station measurements during this period.
The model was run with a 15 km resolution core over Europe. The figures
below are some results from this simulation. Modelled vs. observed surface ozone at Rochester, UK. Scatter plot of modelled vs. observed maximum temperature.
|